Symbolae Osloenses 84 (84):73-90 (2010)

In this paper, I question a widespread reading of a passage in the last part of the Phaedrus dealing with the science of dialectic. According to this reading, the passage announces a new method peculiar to the later Plato aiming at defining natural kinds. I show that the Phaedrus itself does not support such a reading. As an alternative reading, I suggest that the science of dialectic, as discussed in the passage, must be seen as dealing primarily with philosophical rhetoric and knowledge of human souls.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Seeing Double.Jens Kristian Larsen - 2021 - Plato Journal 22.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus.Daniel Werner - 2010 - Greece and Rome 57 (1):21-46.
Play and Myth in Plato's Phaedrus.Noa I. Ayalon - 2017 - Childhood and Philosophy 13 (26):129-152.
Zeus and Philosophy in The Myth of Plato’s Phaedrus.M. Dyson - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (2):307-311.
Zeus and Philosophy in the Myth of Plato’s Phaedrus.M. Dyson - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (02):307-.
Dialectic, Irony, and Myth in Plato's Phaedrus.Albert Cook - 1985 - American Journal of Philology 106 (4):427.
A Much Disputed “Whole” at Phaedrus 270.Karel Thein - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):139-152.


Added to PP index

Total views
315 ( #32,681 of 2,499,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,854 of 2,499,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes