Should There Be Separatist Feminist Epistemologies?

The Monist 77 (4):462-471 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many questions may be asked about the efforts to construct feminist epistemologies. One such question is whether epistemologies really imply values and practices in any significant way. Another is whether the values and practices most epistemologies are taken to be immersed in are indeed masculine. Yet another is what precisely are the feminist values and practices that feminist epistemologies should involve. A fourth is whether women and men really do think so differently from each other. And a fifth possible question is whether feminist epistemologies should be separatist, i.e., such that only women can use and construct them, or whether they should be universal human epistemologies. Although all these questions merit serious discussion, I shall here deal only with the last, assuming, at least for the sake of argument, that the first, second and fourth questions receive positive answers, and that there is a satisfying answer for the third.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
98 (#180,469)

6 months
47 (#93,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iddo Landau
University of Haifa

References found in this work

The Laugh of the Medusa.Hélène Cixous - 1976 - Signs 1 (4):875-893.

Add more references