Reply to Gale's review

Abstract

This is a response to Richard M. Gale’s review of my book God, the Best, and Evil, Clarendon Press 2008. The review was published on-line in May 2009, in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Review of Bruce Langtry, God, the Best, and Evil[REVIEW]Richard M. Gale - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5).
Gale on Omnipotence.Theodore M. Drange - 2003 - Philo 6 (1):23-26.
A reply to Oaklander.Richard M. Gale - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
A reply to mr. Gale.John Wild - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (3):377-383.
A Reply to Paul Helm.Richard Gale - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):257 - 263.
A reply on the alleged futurity of yesterday.Richard M. Gale - 1964 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):421-422.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-30

Downloads
137 (#131,092)

6 months
38 (#94,664)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Langtry
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references