Hans Kelsen's Concept of Normative Imputation

Ratio Juris 26 (1):85-110 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article compares and contrasts Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation, in the Lecture Course of 1926, with the concepts of peripheral and central imputation, in The Pure Theory of Law of 1934. In this process, a wider and more significant distinction is revealed within the development of Hans Kelsen's theory of positive law. This distinction represents a shift in Kelsen's philosophical allegiance from the Neo-Kantianism of Windelband to that of Cohen. This, in turn, reflects a broader disengagement of The Pure Theory of Law from the more direct connection with a political project of a civitas maxima envisaged by the Lecture Course



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

General theory of norms.Hans Kelsen - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causality and imputation.Hans Kelsen - 1950 - Ethics 61 (1):1-11.
Kelsen's concept of the authority of law.Bruno Celano - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):173-199.
Hans Kelsen's normativist reductionism.Enrico Pattaro - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (2):268-280.


Added to PP

31 (#459,890)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Purity Thesis.Stanley L. Paulson - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (3):276-306.

Add more citations