Sue Ned Block!: Making a better case for P-consciousness

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):511-512 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Block makes a case for the existence of conscious experience without access. His case would have been much stronger, however, if he had woven fully unconscious processing into the and considered arguments that are intrinsic to neuroscience

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness without conflation.Anthony P. Atkinson & Martin Davies - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):248-249.
Does phenomenology overflow access?Neil Levy - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (7):29-38.
A case where access implies qualia?Andy Clark - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):30-37.
Sidestepping the semantics of “consciousness”.Michael V. Antony - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):289-290.
Empirical status of Block's phenomenal/access distinction.Bruce Mangan - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):153-154.
Why Block Can't Stand the HOT.Joshua Shepherd - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (3-4):183-195.
Availability: The cognitive basis of experience?David J. Chalmers - 1997 - In Ned Block, Owen J. Flanagan & Guven Guzeldere (eds.), The Nature of Consciousness. MIT Press. pp. 148-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
42 (#359,513)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?