Theory and Decision 80 (1):101-123 (2016)
AbstractApplications of willingness to pay have shown the difficultly to discriminate between various options. This reflects the problem of embedding in both its specific sense, of options being nested within one another, and its more general sense, whereby respondents cannot discriminate between close substitutes or between more-disparate rivals for the same budget. Furthermore, high proportions of reversals between WTP-value and simple preference based rankings of options are often highlighted. Although an incremental WTP approach was devised to encourage more differentiated answers and a higher degree of consistency among respondents, a theoretical basis for this approach has not been elucidated, and there is little evidence to show that this approach might indeed achieve greater consistency between explicit and implicit rankings inferred from WTP values. We address both these issues. Following our theoretical exposition, standard and incremental approaches were compared with explicit ranking in a study assessing preferences for different French emergency care services. 280 persons, representative of the French adult population, were interviewed. Half received the incremental version, the other half the standard version. Results suggest that the incremental approach provides a ranking of options fully in line with explicit ranking. The standard approach was reasonably consistent with explicit ranking but proved unable to differentiate between the five most preferred providers, as predicted by theory. Our findings suggest that the incremental approach provides results which can be used in priority-setting contexts.
Similar books and articles
“For Unto Every One That Hath Shall Be Given”. Matthew Properties for Incremental Confirmation.Roberto Festa - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):89-100.
Incremental Encoding and Incremental Articulation in Speech Production: Evidence Based on Response Latency and Initial Segment Duration.Alan H. Kawamoto - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):48-49.
On Empirical Realism and the Defining of Theoretical Terms.Kathleen L. Slaney - 2001 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):132-152.
Understanding Regulatory Law: Empirical Versus Systems-Theoretical Approaches?Bettina Lange - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (3):449-471.
Is Incremental Validity Too Incremental in the Long Run? A Commentary on Stoyanov D., Machamer P.K. & Schaffner, K.F. (2012). [REVIEW]Peter Zachar - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):157-158.
Complexity and Evolution: What Everybody Knows.Daniel W. McShea - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (3):303-324.
Orchestration of Network Instruments: A Way to de-Emphasize the Partition Between Incremental Change and Innovation? [REVIEW]Trond Haga - 2009 - AI and Society 23 (1):17-31.
Una aproximación semántica a la filosofía teórica de Kant.Alex Mumbrú - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (1):149-171.
Anti-Semitism and Critical Social Theory: The Frankfurt School in American Exile.John Abromeit - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (1):140-151.
Omissions, Conflations, and False Dichotomies: Conceptual and Empirical Problems with the Barbey & Sloman Account.Gary L. Brase - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):258-259.
Non-Empirical Requirements Scientific Theories Must Satisfy: Simplicity, Unification, Explanation, Beauty.Nicholas Maxwell - 2004 - PhilSci Archive.
Incremental Acquisition of Paired-Associate Lists.George Mandler - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):185.
On the Origin of the WTA–WTP Divergence in Public Good Valuation.Emmanuel Flachaire, Guillaume Hollard & Jason F. Shogren - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):431-437.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch - forthcoming - Environmental Values.