AI Systems and Respect for Human Autonomy

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study concerns the sociotechnical bases of human autonomy. Drawing on recent literature on AI ethics, philosophical literature on dimensions of autonomy, and on independent philosophical scrutiny, we first propose a multi-dimensional model of human autonomy and then discuss how AI systems can support or hinder human autonomy. What emerges is a philosophically motivated picture of autonomy and of the normative requirements personal autonomy poses in the context of algorithmic systems. Ranging from consent to data collection and processing, to computational tasks and interface design, to institutional and societal considerations, various aspects related to sociotechnical systems must be accounted for in order to get the full picture of potential effects of AI systems on human autonomy. It is clear how human agents can, for example, via coercion or manipulation, hinder each other’s autonomy, or how they can respect each other’s autonomy. AI systems can promote or hinder human autonomy, but can they literally respect or disrespect a person’s autonomy? We argue for a philosophical view according to which AI systems—while not moral agents or bearers of duties, and unable to literally respect or disrespect—are governed by so-called “ought-to-be norms.” This explains the normativity at stake with AI systems. The responsible people (designers, users, etc.) have duties and ought-to-do norms, which correspond to these ought-to-be norms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fully Autonomous AI.Wolfhart Totschnig - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2473-2485.
Whose life is it anyway? A study in respect for autonomy.M. Norden - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):179-183.
Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation.Alistair Wardrope - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):563-566.
Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI.Luciano Floridi - 2019 - Nature Machine Intelligence 1:261-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-01

Downloads
30 (#392,052)

6 months
12 (#78,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations