Review of Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks: Brute science: Dilemmas of animal experimentation [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):621-624 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121.
Review. Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation. Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks.Mark Parascandola - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):621-624.
Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Joseph Mahon - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):130-131.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Util‐izing Animals.Niall Shanks Hugh Lafollette - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Accept No Substitutes: The Ethics of Alternatives.Joel Marks - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):S16-S18.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh LaFollette
University of South Florida

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references