Why hiroshima was immoral: A response to Landesman

Philosophical Forum 34 (1):39–42 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/1467-9191.00123

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The harm of immorality.Paul Bloomfield - 2008 - Ratio 21 (3):241-259.
Rawls on hiroshima: An inquiry into the morality of the use of atomic weapons in August 1945.Charles Landesman - 2003 - Philosophical Forum 34 (1):21–38.
Peace Culture in Hiroshima.Mitsuo Okamoto - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:113-118.
Philosophy after Hiroshima.Ėduard Vasilʹevich Demenchonok (ed.) - 2010 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Is it irrational to be immoral? A response to Freeman.Harvey Siegel - 1978 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 10 (2):51–61.
Reiterated Commemoration: Hiroshima as National Trauma.Hiro Saito - 2006 - Sociological Theory 24 (4):353 - 376.
Explaining Terrorism.Kristin Andrews - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:167-171.
We Are What We Eat.Clifton Perry - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (4):341-350.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#138,075)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Lackey
Baruch College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references