Roles for Values in Scientific Activities

Axiomathes 28 (6):603-618 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to rebut objections that have been made of the account of the various roles for values in scientific activities that I have developed, initially in my book Is Science Value Free?, in response to criticizing the proposal that science is value free. Specifically I respond to objections that my account does not recognize the significance of basic science, and that my defense of the ideal of impartiality cannot be sustained.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Douglas on values: From indirect roles to multiple goals.Kevin C. Elliott - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):375-383.
Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal.David Ludwig - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (6):1253-1272.
A new direction for science and values.Daniel J. Hicks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science.Kevin C. Elliott - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (2):303-324.
Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice.Paul L. Franco - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (1):160-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-15

Downloads
38 (#398,871)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College

Citations of this work

The methodological strategies of agroecological research and the values with which they are linked.Hugh Lacey - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):292-302.

Add more citations