Money Does Not Grow on Trees: An Argument for Usury [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):383-387 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Usury, charging a higher interest rate than thought by some to be “fair,” has had and still has, a bad press. Historically, it was heavily punished. It was then, and all too often is now, thought to be exploitative. Yet, as even the most economically unsophisticated must realize, both sides of these transactions must necessarily gain at least in the ex ante sense, otherwise one or the other would refuse to enter into the deal in the first place. The present paper is an attempt to justify the practice of charging interest on loans, at any rate agreeable to both borrowers and lenders

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-14

Downloads
61 (#258,521)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When and Why Usury Should be Prohibited.Robert Mayer - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):513-527.
The Cost of Usury.Robert Mayer - 2013 - Business Ethics Journal Review:44-49.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references