Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2021)

Authors
Abstract
After reading the stimulating exchange between Chris Drain and Siyaves Azeri, I wanted to reply to Drain from a slightly different angle. Drain’s latest response takes aim at what Vygotsky calls his general genetic law of development, which Drain suggests should be updated through an appreciation of Tomasello and Searle’s concept of “joint intentionality”. At the heart of Vygotsky’s thought is the claim that “every function in the cultural development of the child appears on the stage twice, in two planes, first, the social, then the psychological, first between people as an intermental category, then within the child as an intramental category”. Drain takes Vygotsky to derive this from Hegel’s “master-slave dialectic”. Drain appears to follow Alexandre Kojève’s influential interpretation of Hegel, as picked up by continental philosophers like Sartre, in which the dialectic is treated as an allegory about social antagonism. As continental thought turned against Hegel and Marx, this reading was retained and Hegel himself was associated with social subordination. As a starting point for my response, I would note that Vygotsky and Hegel are not offering a social critique here: they are making a more basic point about the process of determination as such. Radical liberal constructivist critiques of Vygotsky of the kind offered by Jones and Stetsenko follow continental philosophy and critical theory in ignoring the constructive side of Hegelian negation and recognition.
Keywords Vygotsky
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1994 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):389-394.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abstract Rationality in Education: From Vygotsky to Brandom.Jan Derry - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (1):49-62.
Ideality and Cognitive Development: Further Comments on Azeri’s “The Match of Ideals”.Chris Drain - 2020 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11):15-27.
Vygotsky’s Natural History of Signs.Lauri Linask - 2019 - Sign Systems Studies 47 (1/2):257-304.
Cultural-Historical Theory in a Dialectical Optic.Valentin A. Bazhanov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (4):237-243.
Vygotsky in Perspective.Ronald Miller - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky in His, Our and Future Times.Gordana Jovanović - 2015 - History of the Human Sciences 28 (2):3-7.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-26

Total views
17 ( #622,196 of 2,462,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,488 of 2,462,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes