Authors
Brent G. Kyle
United States Air Force Academy
Abstract
The doctrine of penal substitution claims that it was good (or required) for God to punish in response to human sin, and that Christ received this punishment in our stead. I argue that this doctrine’s central factual claim—that Christ was punished by God—is mistaken. In order to punish someone, one must at least believe the recipient is responsible for an offense. But God surely did not believe the innocent Christ was responsible for an offense, let alone the offense of human sin. So, the central factual claim is mistaken. In the final section, I show that this critique of penal substitution does not apply to the closely-related Anselmian satisfaction theory
Keywords Punishment  Atonement  Penal substitution  Satisfaction theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9382-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Punishment.David Boonin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Responsibility and Atonement.Richard Swinburne - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
On Punishment.A. M. Quinton - 1953 - Analysis 14 (6):133 - 142.
Do We Believe in Penal Substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.Mark C. Murphy - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
Do We Believe in Penal Substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Punishment and Freedom.Alan Brudner - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Punishment.Christopher Bennett - 2004 - Philosophical Books 45 (4):324-334.
Punishment, Communication and Community.Antony Duff - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Atonement Without Satisfaction.Richard Cross - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):397-416.
A Participatory Model of the Atonement.Tim Bayne & Greg Restall - 2009 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 150.
Trading Truth for Justice?Claudio Tamburrini - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):153-167.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-01

Total views
488 ( #18,564 of 2,506,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #24,197 of 2,506,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes