- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Responses to Critics
In Pritchard, Haddock & Millar (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 339-353 (2009)
Abstract
I begin by expressing my sincere thanks to my critics for taking time from their own impressive projects in epistemology to consider mine. Often, in reading their criticisms, I had the feeling of having received more help than I really wanted! But the truth of the matter is that we learn best by making mistakes, and I appreciate the conscientious attention to my work that my critics have shownAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Two conceptions of machine phenomenality.Steve Torrance - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):154-166.
Responses to Critics. [REVIEW]Gilbert Harman - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):207-213.
Responses to my critics.Robert B. Talisse - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 90-108.
Review: Responses to Critics. [REVIEW]Gilbert Harman - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):207 - 213.
Summary of the spoken responses by the poets to their critics.John Hollander - 1996 - Philosophy and Literature 20 (1):189-192.
Responses to my critics, Erin Kelly and B. C. Postow.James P. Sterba - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):397–405.
Responses to critics of the construction of social reality.Review author[S.]: John R. Searle - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):449-458.
Responses to the critics.Thomas Pogge - 2010 - In Alison Jaggar (ed.), Thomas Pogge and His Critics. Malden, MA: Polity.
``The Rational Significance of Reflective Ascent".Jonathan Kvanvig - 2011 - In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Responses and Dialogue: Ethics Consultation: The Most Dangerous Profession: A Reply to Critics.Giles R. Scofield - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (2):225.
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
The aesthetic turn: reading Eliot Deutsch on comparative philosophy.Roger T. Ames (ed.) - 2000 - Chicago, Ill.: Open Court.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).Andrés Páez - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (3):441-459.
Idealizations and scientific understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Andrés Páez - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (3):441-459.
What is Understanding? An Overview of Recent Debates in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.Christoph Baumberger, Claus Beisbart & Georg Brun - 2017 - In Stephen Grimm Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.), Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives from Epistemolgy and Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 1-34.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo