Developing intuitions about free will between ages four and six

, , , &
Cognition 138 (C):79-101 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.003

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,395

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Marshall M. Weinberg Conference: The Future of Cognitive Science - Thursday afternoon (Oct. 16, 2008) session: John R. Anderson and Alison Gopnik. [REVIEW]John R. Anderson & Alison Gopnik - unknown
The Child's Theory of Mind.Henry M. Wellman - 1990 - MIT Press (MA).
Gopnik, Alison. The Gardner and the Carpenter: What the New Science of Child Development Tells Us about the Relationship between Parents and Children. [REVIEW]David F. Bjorklund - 2017 - Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1 (1):229-232.
The Philosophical Baby: What Children’s Minds Tell Us About Truth, Love, and the Meaning of Life, by Alison Gopnik.Dale Murray - 2014 - Teaching Philosophy 37 (1):118-122.
Why Alison Gopnik should be a behaviorist.Nicholas S. Thompson - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):83-84.
Experimental philosophy of actual and counterfactual free will intuitions.Adam Feltz - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 36 (C):113-130.
Alison Gopnik and Andrew N. Meltzoff, Words, Thoughts, and Theories Reviewed by.Timothy Bayne - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17 (4):254-256.
18 The baby in the lab-coat: why child development is not an adequate model for understanding the development of science.Luc Faucher, Ron Mallon, Daniel Nazer, Shaun Nichols, Aaron Ruby, Stephen Stich & Jonathan Weinberg - 2002 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
The baby in the lab-coat: Why child development is not an adequate model for understanding the development of science.Daniel Nazer, Aaron Ruby, Shaun Nichols, Jonathan Weinberg, Stephen Stich, Luc Faucher & Ron Mallon - 2002 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
72 (#240,972)

6 months
14 (#352,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tamar Kushnir
Duke University
Alison Gopnik
University of California, Berkeley
Nadia Chernyak

Citations of this work

Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.Jonathan Phillips & Fiery Cushman - 2017 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (18):4649-4654.
Do We Decide Intentionally?E. J. Coffman - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):822-827.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 28 references / Add more references