A proof–theoretic study of the correspondence of hybrid logic and classical logic

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):35-61 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we show the equivalence between the provability of a proof system of basic hybrid logic and that of translated formulas of the classical predicate logic with equality and explicit substitution by a purely proof–theoretic method. Then we show the equivalence of two groups of proof systems of hybrid logic: the group of labelled deduction systems and the group of modal logic-based systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Modal Logic: Graph. Darst.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema.
Proof theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1975 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Modal Logic.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - Studia Logica 76 (1):142-148.
Proof Theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (1):160-161.
Modal logic and classical logic.Johan van Benthem - 1983 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Distributed in the U.S.A. by Humanities Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references