‘Must’ implies ‘can’

Mind and Language 37 (3):620-643 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An open question in the semantics of modality is what relations there are among different modal flavours. In this article, we consider the thorny issue of whether ascribing to an agent the obligation to φ implies that it is possible for the agent to φ. Traditionally, this issue has been interpreted as whether ‘ought’ implies ‘can’. But another linguistic interpretation is available as well, namely, whether ‘must’ implies ‘can’ (MIC). We show that ‘must’ does imply ‘can’ via a convergent argument. The first strand of the argument is theoretical: it consists in proving MIC from a well-established theory of modality in natural language, i.e., that proposed by Kratzer. The second strand is empirical: we present novel acceptability judgment studies showing that MIC predicts and explains the linguistic behaviour of native English speakers.

Similar books and articles

The handbook of contemporary semantic theory.Shalom Lappin (ed.) - 1995 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference.
A strictly stronger relative must.Christopher Gauker - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):82-89.
Agency, Consequence and Morality.Philip Robert West - 1988 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
I Ought, Therefore I Can Obey.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2018 - Philosophers' Imprint 18.
Consequentialism and the "Ought Implies Can" Principle.Elinor Mason - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4):319-331.
What Realism Implies and What it Does Not.Richard Boyd - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (1‐2):5-29.
The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood.Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Does Kant Hold that Ought Implies Can?Shyam Ranganathan - 2010 - In J. Sharma & A. Raguramaraju (eds.), Grounding Morality. Routledge. pp. 60-87.
Epistemicism and modality.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):803-835.
‘Ought implies Can’ and the law.Chris Fox & Guglielmo Feis - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):370-393.


Added to PP

212 (#71,139)

6 months
61 (#31,250)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Luca Barlassina
University of Sheffield
Miklos Kurthy
University of Sheffield (PhD)
Fabio Del Prete
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Freedom and reason.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
The nature and structure of content.Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.

View all 28 references / Add more references