Hohfeldian Infinities: Why Not to Worry

Res Publica 23 (1):137-146 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hillel Steiner has recently attacked the notion of inalienable rights, basing some of his arguments on the Hohfeldian analysis to show that infinite arrays of legal positions would not be associated with any inalienable rights. This essay addresses the nature of the Hohfeldian infinity: the main argument is that what Steiner claims to be an infinite regress is actually a wholly unproblematic form of infinite recursion. First, the nature of the Hohfeldian recursion is demonstrated. It is shown that infinite recursions of legal positions ensue regardless of whether inalienable rights exist or not. Second, the alleged problems that this might pose for the analysis are discussed. The conclusion is that one should not worry about the recursion as long as one understands correctly the role of the Hohfeldian analysis in normative reasoning.

Similar books and articles

A Hohfeldian Analysis of Hobbesian Rights.Arthur Yates - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (4):405-434.
Hohfeldian Normative Systems.Pierfrancesco Biasetti - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):951-959.
The Concept of Rights.George Winston Rainbolt - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Liabilities in private law.Peter Jaffey - 2008 - Legal Theory 14 (4):233-255.
Rights, duties, liabilities, and hohfeld.Andrew Halpin - 2007 - Legal Theory 13 (1):23-39.
The nature and basis of inalienable rights.Terrance McConnell - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
The Ground of Rights: A Contractarian Model in the Scheme of Hohfeldian Rights.Sung-min Jo - 1988 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-10

Downloads
265 (#69,762)

6 months
81 (#46,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Visa A. J. Kurki
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An essay on rights.Hillel Steiner - 1994 - Oxford, UK ;: Blackwell.
An Essay on Rights.Gerald F. Gaus - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):203.
The nature of rights debate rests on a mistake.Siegfried van Duffel - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):104-123.
An Essay on Rights.Dudley Knowles - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (184):395-398.

View all 7 references / Add more references