Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):990-991 (2001)
AbstractThe sensorimotor theory of vision successfully blends in with the currently developing action-oriented account of cognition. As a theory of phenomenal consciousness, however, it suffers from the same shortcomings as the theories O'Regan & Noë (O&N) criticize. This is mainly due to the failure to avoid the explanatory gap by rejecting one notion of qualia while retaining the concept of experience with qualitative features in general.
Similar books and articles
On the role of perceptual consciousness in explaining the goals and mechanisms of vision: A convergence on attention?Naomi Eilan - 2006 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):67-88.
Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems.Nivedita Gangopadhyay, Michael Madary & Finn Spicer (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
The gap into dissolution: The real story.Martin Kurthen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):157-158.
Consciousness in act and action.Keith Hossack - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):187-203.
The problems of consciousness and content in theories of perception.Nini Praetorius - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):349-367.
On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Enactivism and the unity of perception and action.Nivedita Gangopadhyay & Julian Kiverstein - 2009 - Topoi 28 (1):63-73.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Human Consciousness: Where Is It From and What Is It for.Boris Kotchoubey - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
References found in this work
No references found.