Conception of Saviour Siblings: Ethical Perceptions of Selected Stakeholders in Malaysia

Asian Bioethics Review 13 (2):167-178 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The conception of saviour siblings using preimplantation genetic diagnosis coupled with human leukocyte antigen typing or HLA typing alone is controversial and receives a wide divergence of legal responses among countries around the world. The resulting child conceived through this procedure is dubbed a ‘saviour sibling’ as the child can potentially act as a compatible donor for an elder ailing sibling who needs a haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At present, the acceptability of this procedure in Malaysia is ambiguous as there is no specific statute governing assisted reproductive technology, and the guideline issued by the Malaysian Medical Council does not expressly address this issue. The ethical arguments relating to the conception of saviour siblings in the current literature are mainly thought to reflect a liberal viewpoint which is predominantly Western in nature. This paper seeks to explore the perception of selected key stakeholders on the acceptability of and ethical concerns related to this procedure in the Malaysian context. The findings indicate that stakeholders generally support the conception of saviour siblings and some of their concerns echo the Western viewpoint. Interestingly, many were highly anxious about its economic implication, which is rarely discussed in the current literature on saviour siblings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?S. Sheldon - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):533-537.
Ethical Perceptions of Genetically Modified Crops in Malaysia.Latifah Amin, N. A. Ahmad Azlan & J. Ahmad - 2014 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 24 (2):50-60.
Saviour siblings and organ transplantation.Stephen Wilkinson - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (3):107-108.
The Strategic Impact of Stakeholders’ Perceptions: A Single Case Study from the Pharmaceutical Industry.Sybille Sachs, Ruth Schmitt & Hans Groth - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:441-452.
A relational approach to saviour siblings?Michael J. Selgelid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):924-925.
Is there a Duty to Create Saviour Siblings?H. Wolbert - 2008 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):22-28.
Saviour siblings: no avoiding the hard questions.Colin Gavaghan - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):931-932.
Is there a duty to create saviour siblings?Werner Wolbert - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):22-28.
Saviour Siblings: reply to critics.Michelle Taylor-Sands - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):933-934.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-18

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant.Allen W. Wood - 2004 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):259-261.
Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?S. Sheldon - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):533-537.

View all 13 references / Add more references