Reconceiving the Family: The Process of Consent in Medical Decisionmaking

Hastings Center Report 26 (2):30-37 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bioethicists think about families in terms of conflicting interests. This mistake results from an impoverished notion of informed consent. Only by adequately characterizing the process of informed consent can we capture the phenomenon of shared decisionmaking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The family rule: a reply to Alderson.D. M. Foreman - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):499-500.
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
The Family in Medical Decisionmaking.Jeffrey Blustein - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (3):6-13.
Conceptions of Family-Centered Medical Decisionmaking and Their Difficulties.Insoo Hyun - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (2):196-200.
Informed Consent and Research Involving the Newly Dead.Mark R. Wicclair - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):351-372.
Commentary on the "Family Rule".P. Alderson - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):497-498.
Family coercion and valid consent.Stephen D. Mallary, Bernard Gert & Charles M. Culver - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Informed consent Hong Kong style: An instance of moderate familism.Ho Mun Chan - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):195 – 206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
22 (#662,974)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?