Don’t We Need Something More in These Extraordinary Times? Response to the Commentaries

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W10-W12 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2019.1579875

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Authors’ Response: Let’s Cross that Bridge… but Don’t Forget to Look Back at Our Old Neighborhood.E. Geraniou & M. Mavrikis - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (3):335-337.
Local pragmatics in a Gricean framework, revisited: response to three commentaries.Mandy Simons - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (5):539-568.
Humans, fruit flies, and automatons.Evan Charney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):381-410.
Trustworthiness in Untrustworthy Times: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Beyond Consent.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (5):W6-W8.
How Emotions Occur: A Reply to Commentaries by Neu, Sundararajan, and Reisenzein.Keith Oatley - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (1):37-38.
Response to Commentators on Waking, Dreaming, Being.Evan Thompson - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (3):982-1000.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
When Do Extraordinary Claims Give Extraordinary Evidence?Robin Hanson - unknown
New Ways to Explore the Relationship–Emotion–Health Connection.David A. Sbarra & James A. Coan - 2018 - Emotion Review 10 (1):76-78.
Response times with nonaging foreperiods.Raymond S. Nickerson & David W. Burnham - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):452.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Placebo Effects and Informed Consent”.Mark Alfano - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):1-3.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Coming Era of Nanomedicine”.Fritz Allhoff - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):1-2.
A Man in a Hurry: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Edward Payson Weston. [REVIEW]Sheldon Lee Gosline - 2015 - Annals of Science 72 (1):133-134.
In reply [reply to commentaries on "how to solve the mind-body problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-18

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace.Bryn S. Esplin & Monica Sosa - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):64-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics.John Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.
What Is a Clinical Ethicist?Jonathan D. Moreno - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):4-5.
The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace.Bryn S. Esplin & Monica Sosa - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):64-66.
Caring for the Undocumented: A View From the Safety Net.Marc Tunzi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):60-62.
Casuistry and its communitarian critics.Mark G. Kuczewski - 1994 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4 (2):99.

View all 10 references / Add more references