The polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer on the critical method in the philosophy

Folia Philosophica 35:53-69 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The subject of the paper is a polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer mainly concerning the understanding of the critical method in philosophy. Nelson refutes the accusation of psychologism and attacks the core of the philosophy of the Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism. In response to those allegations, Cassirer feels obliged to defend the position of his masters and performs this task brilliantly. The present paper considers similarities and differences in the positions of both sides in this debate. I try to evaluate the arguments of both sides and argue that they took basically the same positions, while the existing discrepancies did not justify such an intense polemic. If the disputing sides had approached the discussion in a less emotional way, it could have led to substantive and interesting conclusions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The philosophy of Ernst Cassirer.Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - New York,: Tudor Pub. Co.. Edited by Ernst Cassirer.
Ernst Cassirer.Anthony K. Jensen - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy.Leonard Nelson - 1978 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 34 (2):312-312.
Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy.C. A. Campbell - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):276-278.
Socratic method and critical philosophy.Leonard Nelson (ed.) - 1949 - New York,: Dover Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-11

Downloads
607 (#29,396)

6 months
89 (#53,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomasz Kubalica
University of Silesia In Katowice

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations