Games on Trees and Syntactical Complexity of Formulas

Logic Journal of the IGPL 15 (5-6):653-687 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games have been introduced as a means of characterizing the relation of elementary equivalence between structures, or relational database instances in first order logic , or equivalently Relational Calculus. In∼the usual Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games the rules are determined by a linear ordering of a fixed lenght or, equivalently, by a special kind of tree – a chain of a fixed length –, where each point of that ordering or node of that tree corresponds to a quantification operation. Here we consider Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games whose rules are determined by arbitrary trees such that their nodes correspond either to quantification operations or to connective operations . By playing games on trees, we can refine the class of sentences which are considered in a given game, since a tree represents a particular class of sentences. We define and study several variations of tree games, for first and second order logic . We give a sufficient condition for FO and SO equivalence restricted to formulae with up to n connectives, and hence also a sufficient condition for the non expressibility of a given query in those logics with formulae whose number of logical connectives is less than a given integer. We also give a sufficient condition to prove simultaneous lower bounds in both the number of connectives and in the quantifier types needed to express a given property in FO. If we consider only quantifier types, we get a characterization of the relation of preservation of sentences in the fragment of FO with the given set of quantifier types. We also study tree games for Σn and Πn formulae. To illustrate the use of our games we use them to prove lower bounds in the connective size for several FO queries, like size of a database, size of a clique in a graph, size of a unary relation, transitive property in a graph, and degree of a node in a graph. Regarding SO, we prove lower bounds for quantifier rank for the parity query. Finally, we give a precise characterization of the logic whose elementary equivalence is characterized by a given tree game, as well as several equivalent characterizations of the existence of a winning strategy for Duplicator in the classical Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On complexity of Ehrenfeucht–Fraïssé games.Bakhadyr Khoussainov & Jiamou Liu - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (3):404-415.
On Ehrenfeucht-fraïssé equivalence of linear orderings.Juha Oikkonen - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):65-73.
An Ehrenfeucht‐Fraïssé class game.Wafik Boulos Lotfallah - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (2):179-188.
Comparing the power of games on graphs.Ronald Fagin - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (4):431-455.
Games with Unknown Past.Bakhadyr Khoussainov, Alexander Yakhnis & Vladimir Yakhnis - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (2):185-204.
Infinite games played on finite graphs.Robert McNaughton - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 65 (2):149-184.
Vectorization hierarchies of some graph quantifiers.Lauri Hella & Juha Nurmonen - 2000 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (3):183-207.
Trees and Ehrenfeucht–Fraı̈ssé games.Stevo Todorčević & Jouko Väänänen - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 100 (1-3):69-97.
Game Trees For Decision Analysis.Prakash P. Shenoy - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (2):149-171.
Logic games are complete for game logics.Johan van Benthem - 2003 - Studia Logica 75 (2):183-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
4 (#1,550,102)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references