Borel equivalence relations and Lascar strong types

Journal of Mathematical Logic 13 (2):1350008 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The "space" of Lascar strong types, on some sort and relative to a given complete theory T, is in general not a compact Hausdorff topological space. We have at least three aims in this paper. The first is to show that spaces of Lascar strong types, as well as other related spaces and objects such as the Lascar group Gal L of T, have well-defined Borel cardinalities. The second is to compute the Borel cardinalities of the known examples as well as of some new examples that we give. The third is to explore notions of definable map, embedding, and isomorphism, between these and related quotient objects. We also make some conjectures, the main one being roughly "smooth if and only if trivial". The possibility of a descriptive set-theoretic account of the complexity of spaces of Lascar strong types was touched on in the paper [E. Casanovas, D. Lascar, A. Pillay and M. Ziegler, Galois groups of first order theories, J. Math. Logic1 305–319], where the first example of a "non-G-compact theory" was given. The motivation for writing this paper is partly the discovery of new examples via definable groups, in [A. Conversano and A. Pillay, Connected components of definable groups and o-minimality I, Adv. Math.231 605–623; Connected components of definable groups and o-minimality II, to appear in Ann. Pure Appl. Logic] and the generalizations in [J. Gismatullin and K. Krupiński, On model-theoretic connected components in some group extensions, preprint, arXiv:1201.5221v1].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
30 (#504,503)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Equivalence relations invariant under group actions.Tomasz Rzepecki - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (2):683-702.
Galois groups as quotients of Polish groups.Krzysztof Krupiński & Tomasz Rzepecki - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (3):2050018.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Countable borel equivalence relations.S. Jackson, A. S. Kechris & A. Louveau - 2002 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 2 (01):1-80.
Hyperimaginaries and Automorphism Groups.D. Lascar & A. Pillay - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):127-143.
Galois groups of first order theories.E. Casanovas, D. Lascar, A. Pillay & M. Ziegler - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (02):305-319.
G-compactness and groups.Jakub Gismatullin & Ludomir Newelski - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (5):479-501.
On Bounded Type-Definable Equivalence Relations.Ludomir Newelski & Krzysztof Krupi?Ski - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (4):231-242.

View all 7 references / Add more references