Abstract
The paper argues that in order to understand the nature of technological knowledge it is necessary to develop an epistemology of technical functions. This epistemology has to address the problem of the meaning of the notion of function. In the dominant interpretations, functions are considered to be dispositions, comparable to physical dispositions such as fragility and solubility. It is argued that this conception of functions is principally flawed. With the help of Carnap’s analysis of dispositional terms it is shown that there is a fundamental difference between physical dispositional terms and functional dispositional terms. This difference concerns the issue of the normativity; with regard to functional dispositions, it makes sense to construct normative statements of a particular kind, with regard to physical dispositions it does not.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Philosophy of Science  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1091-8264
DOI techne2001531
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Formal Ontology of Artefacts.Gilles Kassel - 2010 - Applied Ontology 5 (3):223-246.
La peculiaridad del conocimiento tecnológico.Alberto Cupani - 2006 - Scientiae Studia 4 (3):353-371.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dispositions.James M. Bucknell - 2015 - Dissertation, Univeristy of New South Wales
Causation, Laws and Dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 2007 - In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
Active Dispositions.Toby Handfield - 2003 - Dissertation, Monash University
Dispositions Revisited.William W. Rozeboom - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):59-74.
Are Physical Properties Dispositions?Edward Wilson Averill - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):118-132.
Dispositions.Shungho Choi & Michael Fara - 2012 - The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1994 - Cogito 8 (2):141-146.
Dispositions in Physics.Andreas Hüttemann - 2009 - In Gregor Damschen, Robert Schnepf & Karsten Stueber (eds.), Debating Dispositions. De Gruyter. pp. 221-237.
Dispositions and the Argument From Science.Neil E. Williams - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):71 - 90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total views
51 ( #213,690 of 2,462,266 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,271 of 2,462,266 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes