Plastic glasses and church fathers: semantic extension from the ethnoscience tradition

New York: Oxford University Press (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meaning seems to shift from context to context; how do we know when someone says "grab a chair" that an ottoman or orange crate will do, but when someone says "let's buy a chair," they won't? In Plastic Glasses and Church Fathers, Kronenfeld offers a theory that explains both the usefulness of language's variability of reference and the mechanisms which enable us to understand each other in spite of the variability. Kronenfeld's theory, rooted in the tradition of ethnoscience (or cognitive anthropology), accomplishes three things. First, it distinguishes prototypic referents from extended referents. Second, it describes the various bases of semantic extensions. Finally it details how we use the situational context of usage, the linguistic context of opposition and inclusion, and the conceptual context of knowledge about the world to interpret communicative events.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#926,042)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar.Doug Jones - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):367-381.
A Feminist Cognitive Anthropology: The Case of Women and Mathematics.Carol C. Mukhopadhyay - 2004 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 32 (4):458-492.
Owls, Climates, and Experts.Robert L. Munroe & Mary Gauvain - 2018 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 18 (1-2):66-88.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references