The Idea of the Posthuman: A Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (4):132-147 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article discusses the modern philosophical concepts of transhumanism and posthumanism. The central issue of these concepts is “What is the posthuman?” The 21st century is marked by a contradictory understanding of the role and status of the human. On the one hand, there comes the realization of human hegemony over the whole world around: in the 20th century mankind not only began to conquer outer space, invented nuclear weapons, made many amazing discoveries but also shifted its attention to itself or rather to the modification of itself. Transhumanist projects aim to strengthen human influence by transforming human beings into other, more powerful and viable forms of being. Such projects continues the project of human “deification.” On the other hand, acknowledging the onset of the new geological epoch of the Anthropocene, there comes the rejection of classical interpretations of the human. The categories of historicity, sociality and subjectivity are no longer so anthropocentric. In the opinion of the posthumanists, the project of the Vitruvian man has proven to be untenable in the present-day environment and is increasingly criticized. The reflection on the phenomenon of the human and his future refers to the concepts that explore not only human but also non-human. Very often we can find a synonymous understanding of transhumanism and posthumanism. Although these movements work with the same modern constructs and concepts but interpret them in a fundamentally different way. The discourse of transhumanism refers to the Cartesian opposition of the body and the mind. Despite the sacralization of technology and the desire to purify the posthuman from such seemingly permanent attributes of the living as aging and death, transhumanism in many ways continues the ideas of the Enlightenment. For posthumanists, the subject is nomadic and a kind of assembly of human, animal, digital, chimerical. Thus, in posthumanism the main maxim of humanism about the human as the highest value is rejected – the human ceases to be “the measure of all things.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

deconstruction and excision in philosophical posthumanism.David Roden - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36.
What is Posthumanism?Cary Wolfe - 2009 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
A moral vision for transhumanism.Patrick D. Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):3-7.
Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation.Ion Iuga - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (1):79-88.
Editorial–Nietzsche and European posthumanisms.Russell Blackford - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):i-iii.
Homo biotechnologicus.Emil Višňovský - 2015 - Human Affairs 25 (2):230-237.
The Posthumanism to Come.Christopher Peterson - 2011 - Angelaki 16 (2):127-141.
The overhuman in the transhuman.Max More - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
215 (#90,312)

6 months
34 (#99,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The posthuman.Rosi Braidotti - 2013 - Malden, MA, USA: Polity Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
When Species Meet.Donna Jeanne Haraway - 2007 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 11 references / Add more references