Two forms of love: The problem of preferential love in Kierkegaard's works of love

Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The duty to love one's neighbor as oneself is at the core of Kierkegaard's Works of Love . In this book, Kierkegaard unfolds the meaning of neighborly love and claims that it is the only valid form of true love. He contrasts between neighborly love and preferential love (which includes romantic love and friendship) and criticizes the latter for being nothing but a form of selfishness. However, in some contexts, Kierkegaard seems to acknowledge the significance of preferential love relationships, and does not disallow them. Therefore, his understanding of preferential love appears to be confused and inconsistent. My essay discusses the tension in Kierkegaard's position regarding preferential love, and by presenting recent readings of Works of Love , it asks whether this tension is resolvable and offers a suggestion for a possible solution

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
210 (#121,075)

6 months
10 (#420,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sharon Krishek
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

References found in this work

The ethical demand.Knud Ejler Løgstrup - 1956 - Philadelphia,: Fortress Press.
The New Edition of K.E. Løgstrup's The Ethical Demand.Knud Ejler Løgstrup - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):415-426.
Fear and Trembling/Repetition.Søren Kierkegaard, Howard V. Hong & Edna H. Hong - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (3):191-192.

View all 13 references / Add more references