- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Statistical significance in biology: Neither necessary nor sufficient for hypothesis acceptance
Biological Theory 3 (1):12-16 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Does the finding of statistical significance justify the rejection of the Null hypothesis?David Sohn - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):293-294.
Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
Statistical significance: A statistician's view.Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):206-207.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Some statistical misconceptions in Chow's statistical significance.Jacques Poitevineau & Bruno Lecoutre - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-215.
On the position of statistical significance in the epistemology of experimental science.Charles E. Boklage - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-195.
Significance tests: Necessary but not sufficient.Louis G. Tassinary - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):221-222.
Statistics without probability: Significance testing as typicality and exchangeability in data analysis.John R. Vokey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):225-226.
The critics rebutted: A pyrrhic victory.Stephan Lewandowsky & Murray Maybery - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):210-211.
Tests of Significance Violate the Rule of Implication.Davis Baird - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:81 - 92.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
40 (#378,975)
6 months
9 (#250,037)
2010-08-24
Downloads
40 (#378,975)
6 months
9 (#250,037)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Conceptual analysis and special-interest science: toxicology and the case of Edward Calabrese.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2010 - Synthese 177 (3):449 - 469.
Randomization and Rules for Causal Inferences in Biology: When the Biological Emperor (Significance Testing) Has No Clothes.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2011 - Biological Theory 6 (2):154-161.
Agents, Modeling Processes, and the Allure of Prophecy.William A. Griffin, Manfred D. Laubichler & Werner Callebaut - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (1):73-78.
References found in this work
Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1991 - University of California Press.
Method in ecology: strategies for conservation.K. S. Shrader-Frechette (ed.) - 1993 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Toxic Torts: Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice.Carl F. Cranor - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Demarcating Epidemiology.Olga Amsterdamska - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (1):17-51.
The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (4):367-377.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo