Non-novel Indefinites in Adverbial Quantification

Abstract

This influence of accent has been taken as evidence that adverbial quantification is focus sensitive (cf. Rooth (1985)) or presupposition sensitive (cf. von Fintel (1994), Rooth (1995)). I will discuss a problem that has been identified by von Fintel and Rooth, the requantifiation problem. Roughly stated, standard accounts of indefinites as NPs that introduce new discourse referents are at odds with standard accounts of the focus sensitivity or presupposition sensitivity of (1), which force us to assume that indefinites may pick up existing discourse referents and “requantify” over them. I will argue for a special class of indefinites that pick up existing discourse referents, which I will call non-novel indefinites, to explain the nature..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

How indefinites choose their scope.Adrian Brasoveanu & Donka F. Farkas - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55.
Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions.Scott AnderBois - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):349-390.
Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites.Karen S. Lewis - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):313-342.
Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither?Manfred Krifka - 2003 - Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13:180.
The meaning of free choice.Anastasia Giannakidou - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (6):659-735.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references