Distrust and Discovery: The Case of the Heavy Bosons at CERN

Isis 92:517-540 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay describes the microhistorical process whereby different groups of scientific actors came to claim that a new fundamental particle had been discovered at CERN. Particular attention is paid to the role of trust, and of distrust, in the directorate's planning of the experimental program and in their interpretation and promotion of its first results. Distrust demanded independent replication; it also influenced the way in which the CERN director general managed the credibility of the results for the world's press, turning a plausible but not yet widely accepted hypothesis into an undisputed fact. Produced and circulated in a context that included physicists, funding agencies, governments, and national power blocs, the discovery of the bosons by physicists in Europe challenged American domination of the field and shaped U.S. accelerator policy for the 1990s

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emerging from distrust: a review of strategies and principles for action. [REVIEW]Patti Tamara Lenard - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):357-368.
Corporate espionage and workplace trust/distrust.Marjorie Chan - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):45 - 58.
Trust and Responsibility in Health Policy.Meredith C. Schwartz - 2009 - Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (2):116-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
24 (#617,476)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Robust evidence and secure evidence claims.Kent W. Staley - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):467-488.
Local explanation in historiography of science.Veli Virmajoki - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-21.
In Defense of Causal Presentism.Veli Virmajoki - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):68-96.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references