The Hume-Plantinga Objection to the Argument from Design

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 68:85-92 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00657638

DOI

10.5840/acpaproc19946820

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hume's chief objection to natural theology.M. C. Bradley - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (3):249-270.
A Humean objection to Plantinga’s Quantitative Free Will Defense.Anders Kraal - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):221-233.
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
The “who designed the designer?” objection to design arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125-146.
Response to Stephen Law on the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Calum Miller - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):147-152.
The fine-tuning argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Plantinga, God, and (yet) other minds.Robert J. Richman - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):40 – 54.
Response to Churchland.Aaron Segal & Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - Philo 13 (2):201-207.
Meta-Argumentation in Hume’s Critique of the Design Argument.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - unknown
Unnatural Religion: Indoctrination and Philo's Reversal in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.Rich Foley - 2006 - Hume Studies 32 (1):83-112.
Anthropic Observation Selection Effects and the Design Argument.Ira M. Schnall - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):361-377.
In Defense of Classical Foundationalism: A Critical Evaluation of Plantinga’s Argument that Classical Foundationalism is Self-Refuting.John M. DePoe - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):245-251.
What kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga refuted?Ralf-Thomas Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):304-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
70 (#229,722)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elmar Joseph Kremer
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references