Term extraction and Ramsey's theorem for pairs
Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (3):853-895 (2012)
Abstract
In this paper we study with proof-theoretic methods the function(al) s provably recursive relative to Ramsey's theorem for pairs and the cohesive principle (COH). Our main result on COH is that the type 2 functional provably recursive from $RCA_0 + COH + \Pi _1^0 - CP$ are primitive recursive. This also provides a uniform method to extract bounds from proofs that use these principles. As a consequence we obtain a new proof of the fact that $WKL_0 + \Pi _1^0 - CP + COH$ is $\Pi _1^0 $ -conservative over PRA. Recent work of the first author showed that $\Pi _1^0 + CP + COH$ is equivalent to a weak variant of the Bolzano-Weierstraß principle. This makes it possible to use our results to analyze not only combinatorial but also analytical proofs. For Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors $\left( {RT_2^2 } \right)$ we obtain the upper bounded that the type 2 functionals provable recursive relative to $RCA_0 + \sum\nolimits_2^0 {IA + RT_2^2 } $ are in T₁. This is the fragment of Gödel's system T containing only type 1 recursion—roughly speaking it consists of functions of Ackermann type. With this we also obtain a uniform method for the extraction of T₁-bounds from proofs that use RT2..... Moreover, this yields a new proof of the fact that $WKL_0 + \sum\nolimits_2^0 {IA} + RT_2^2 $ is $\Pi _1^0 $ -conservative over $RCA_0 + \sum\nolimits_2^0 { - IA} $ . The results are obtained in two steps: in the first step a term including Skolem functions for the above principles is extracted from a given proof. This is done using Gödel's functional interpretation. After this the term is normalized, such that only specific instances of the Skolem functions are used. In the second step this term is interpreted using $\Pi _1^0 $ -comprehension. The comprehension is then eliminated in favor of induction using either elimination of monotone Skolem functions (for COH) or Howard's ordinal analysis of bar recursion (for $RT_2^2 $DOI
10.2178/jsl/1344862165
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs and Provably Recursive Functions.Alexander Kreuzer & Ulrich Kohlenbach - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (4):427-444.
On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs.Peter A. Cholak, Carl G. Jockusch & Theodore A. Slaman - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):1-55.
Stable Ramsey's Theorem and Measure.Damir D. Dzhafarov - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):95-112.
Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's Theorem for pairs.Denis R. Hirschfeldt & Richard A. Shore - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):171-206.
On the Ramsey property for sets of reals.Ilias G. Kastanas - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (4):1035-1045.
The converse principal type-scheme theorem in lambda calculus.Sachio Hirokawa - 1992 - Studia Logica 51 (1):83 - 95.
On theoretical constructs and Ramsey constants.R. M. Martin - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):1-13.
An ordinal partition avoiding pentagrams.Jean A. Larson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):969-978.
A new proof that analytic sets are Ramsey.Erik Ellentuck - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (1):163-165.
A recursion theoretic analysis of the clopen Ramsey theorem.Peter Clote - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):376-400.
On the Indecomposability of $\omega^{n}$.Jared R. Corduan & François G. Dorais - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):373-395.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-11-06
Downloads
20 (#565,488)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2012-11-06
Downloads
20 (#565,488)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Primitive Recursion and the Chain Antichain Principle.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):245-265.
Program extraction for 2-random reals.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):659-666.
From Bolzano-Weierstraß to Arzelà-Ascoli.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2014 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (3):177-183.
References found in this work
Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte erweiterung Des finiten standpunktes.Von Kurt Gödel - 1958 - Dialectica 12 (3‐4):280-287.
On the Strength of Ramsey's Theorem.David Seetapun & Theodore A. Slaman - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (4):570-582.
Mathematically strong subsystems of analysis with low rate of growth of provably recursive functionals.Ulrich Kohlenbach - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (1):31-71.
A cohesive set which is not high.Carl Jockusch & Frank Stephan - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):515-530.
Reverse mathematics: the playground of logic.Richard A. Shore - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):378-402.