Some supervaluation-based consequence relations

Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):225-244 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we define some consequence relations based on supervaluation semantics for partial models, and we investigate their properties. For our main consequence relation, we show that natural versions of the following fail: upwards and downwards Lowenheim-Skolem, axiomatizability, and compactness. We also consider an alternate version for supervaluation semantics, and show both axiomatizability and compactness for the resulting consequence relation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#201,843)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Kremer
University of Toronto at Scarborough
Michael Kremer
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

Supervaluationism and Its Logics.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):633-676.
Supervaluation-Style Truth Without Supervaluations.Johannes Stern - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (5):817-850.
In the Beginning was Game Semantics?Giorgi Japaridze - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 249--350.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
Model Theory.Michael Makkai, C. C. Chang & H. J. Keisler - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1096.

View all 20 references / Add more references