Abstract |
It is argued that the traditional philosophical/linguistic analysis of semiotic phe-nomena is based on the false epistemological assumption that linguistic and non-linguistic entities possess different ontologies. An attempt is made to show where linguistics as the study of signs went wrong, and an unorthodox account of the na-ture of semiosis is proposed in the framework of autopoiesis as a new epistemology of the living.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Tree of Knowledge:The Biological Roots of Human Understanding.Humberto R. Maturana & Francisco J. Varela - 1992 - Cognition.
View all 16 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Internal and the External in Linguistic Explanation.Brian Epstein - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):77-111.
Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives.Corinne Iten - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Grounds, Convention, and the Metaphysics of Linguistic Tokens.Brian Epstein - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):45-67.
A Contextualist Account of the Linguistic Reality.Maciej Witek - 2008 - In Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University 4. Semper.
On the Eliminatibility of Ideal Linguistic Entities.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (4):587 - 615.
The Language of Signs: Semiosis and the Memories of the Future. [REVIEW]Inna Semetsky - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):95-116.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
44 ( #259,297 of 2,519,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,860 of 2,519,682 )
2009-01-28
Total views
44 ( #259,297 of 2,519,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,860 of 2,519,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads