The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (1):21-29 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle.

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Vaccination.Alberto Giubilini - 2019 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
Narrative Ethics, COVID-19, and Flawed Stories.Howard Brody - 2022 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 65 (4):535-539.
Vaccine Ethics: Ethical Considerations in Childhood Vaccination.J. C. Bester - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 437-451.
Mandating Vaccination.Anthony Skelton & Lisa Forsberg - 2020 - In Meredith Celene Schwartz (ed.), The Ethics of Pandemics. pp. 131-134.


Added to PP

145 (#102,400)

6 months
65 (#28,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven R. Kraaijeveld
Radboud University

Citations of this work

“The Danger of Words”: Language Games in Bioethics.Michael A. Ashby - 2023 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (1):1-5.

Add more citations