Whence the autonomy?: A response to Harnad and Dror [Book Review]

Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (3):587-597 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The internalist account of cognition is questioned and the explanatory power of the biology of cognition in resolving epistemological issues is emphasized. It is argued that, far from being an autonomous activity within the brains of cognizers which generates input/output capacity and can be auditioned by the Turing Test, cognition is a function of living systems as unities of interactions that exist in an environment in structural coupling. Therefore, it is distributed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Intentionality and computationalism: Minds, machines, Searle and Harnad.Michael G. Dyer - 1990 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2:303-19.
The Ubiquity of Computation.Eric Dietrich - 1993 - Think (misc) 2 (June):27-29.
Moral autonomy, civil liberties, and confucianism.Joseph Chan - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
A response to Monica Mookherjee.Fariha Thomas - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):169-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Distributed language and dynamics.Stephen J. Cowley - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (3):495-508.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references