Demonstrating ‘respect for persons’ in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants
Stephanie A. Kraft, Erin Rothwell, Seema K. Shah, Devan M. Duenas, Hannah Lewis, Kristin Muessig, Douglas J. Opel, Katrina A. B. Goddard & Benjamin S. Wilfond
Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e8-e8 (2021)
AbstractThe ethical principle of ‘respect for persons’ in clinical research has traditionally focused on protecting individuals’ autonomy rights, but respect for participants also includes broader, although less well understood, ethical obligations to regard individuals’ rights, needs, interests and feelings. However, there is little empirical evidence about how to effectively convey respect to potential and current participants. To fill this gap, we conducted exploratory, qualitative interviews with participants in a clinical genomics implementation study. We interviewed 40 participants in English or Spanish about their experiences with respect in the study and perceptions of how researchers in a hypothetical observational study could convey respect or a lack thereof. Most interviewees were female, identified as Hispanic/Latino or non-Hispanic white, reported annual household income under US$60 000 and did not have a Bachelor’s degree ; 30% had limited health literacy. We identified four key domains for demonstrating respect: personal study team interactions, with an emphasis on empathy, appreciation and non-judgment; study communication processes, including following up and sharing results with participants; inclusion, particularly ensuring materials are understandable and procedures are accessible; and consent and authorisation, including providing a neutral informed consent and keeping promises regarding privacy protections. While the experience of respect is inherently subjective, these findings highlight four key domains that may meaningfully demonstrate respect to potential and current research participants. Further empirical and normative work is needed to substantiate these domains and evaluate how best to incorporate them into the practice of research.
Similar books and articles
What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research?David Wendler & Christine Grady - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
What Does 'Respect for Persons' Require? Attitudes and Reported Practices of Genetics Researchers in Informing Research Participants About Research.F. A. Miller, R. Z. Hayeems, L. Li & J. P. Bytautas - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):48-52.
The Search for Clarity in Communicating Research Results to Study Participants.D. I. Shalowitz & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e17-e17.
Attitudes of Research Ethics Board Chairs Towards Disclosure of Research Results to Participants: Results of a National Survey.S. D. MacNeil & C. V. Fernandez - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):549-553.
Bereaved Participants’ Reasons for Wanting Their Real Names Used in Thanatology Research.Bonnie J. Scarth - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (2):80-96.
Vulnerability in Palliative Care Research: Findings From a Qualitative Study of Black Caribbean and White British Patients with Advanced Cancer.J. Koffman, M. Morgan, P. Edmonds, P. Speck & I. J. Higginson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):440-444.
Exploring Researchers’ Experiences of Working with a Researcher-Driven, Population-Specific Community Advisory Board in a South African Schizophrenia Genomics Study.Megan M. Campbell, Ezra Susser, Jantina de Vries, Adam Baldinger, Goodman Sibeko, Michael M. Mndini, Sibonile G. Mqulwana, Odwa A. Ntola, Raj S. Ramesar & Dan J. Stein - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-9.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Ethical Tensions in the Informed Consent Process for Randomized Clinical Trials in Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries.Dan K. Kaye, Gershom Chongwe & Nelson K. Sewankambo - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):27.
The Value of Respect in Human Research Ethics: A Coneptual Analysis and a Practical Guide.Ian Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomason - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):232-253.
Dignity, Being and Becoming in Research Ethics.David G. Kirchhoffer - 2019 - In D. Kirchhoffer & B. Richards (eds.), Beyond Autonomy: Limits and Alternatives to Informed Consent in Research Ethics and Law. Cambridge:
Understanding Respect: Learning From Patients.N. W. Dickert & N. E. Kass - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):419-423.
Understanding Incidental Findings in the Context of Genetics and Genomics.Mildred K. Cho - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):280-285.
Ethics and Research Governance: The Views of Researchers, Health-Care Professionals and Other Stakeholders.Nina Hallowell, Sarah Cooke, Gill Crawford, Michael Parker & Anneke Lucassen - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):85-90.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Fostering Relationships in Pediatric Oncology Research: A Relational Ethics Approach to Clinically Integrated Research.Stephanie A. Kraft & Brittany M. Lee - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):85-88.
Promoting Disclosure and Understanding in Informed Consent: Optimizing the Impact of the Common Rule “Key Information” Requirement.Stephanie A. Kraft, Elliott M. Weiss & Kathryn M. Porter - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):70-72.
Respecting Donor-Recipient Relationships in Research Decision-Making Commentary On: When Living Donor and Kidney Transplant Recipient Are Both Research Subjects.Stephanie A. Kraft - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):112-114.
References found in this work
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Meghan Halley, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Harold S. Luft, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):3-20.
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Scott Y. H. Kim, David Wendler, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Robert Silbergleit, Rebecca D. Pentz, Franklin G. Miller, Bernard Lo, Steven Joffe, Christine Grady, Sara F. Goldkind, Nir Eyal & Neal W. Dickert - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3-11.
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.Neal W. Dickert, Amanda Michelle Bernard, JoAnne M. Brabson, Rodney J. Hunter, Regina McLemore, Andrea R. Mitchell, Stephen Palmer, Barbara Reed, Michele Riedford, Raymond T. Simpson, Candace D. Speight, Tracie Steadman & Rebecca D. Pentz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (5):7-17.
Dynamic Consent: A Potential Solution to Some of the Challenges of Modern Biomedical Research.Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Harriet J. A. Teare, Jane Kaye, Stephan Beck, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Luciana Caenazzo, Clive Collett, Flavio D’Abramo, Heike Felzmann, Teresa Finlay, Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Erica Jones, Višnja Katić, Amy Simpson & Deborah Mascalzoni - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):4.
A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents.Stephanie C. Chen & David T. Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):3-18.