The Diabolical Strategy of Mimesis: Luce Irigaray's Reading of Maurice Merleau-Ponty

Hypatia 11 (3):114-129 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I explore the dynamic between Luce Irigaray and Maurice Merleau-Ponty as it unfolds in An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Irigaray's strategy of mimesis is a powerful feminist tool, both philosophically and politically. Regarding textual engagement as analogous for relations between self and other beyond the text, I deliver a cautionary message: mimetic strategy is powerful but runs the risk of silencing the voice of the other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Luce Irigaray, To Paint the Invisible, translation and interview.Helen A. Fielding - 2004 - Continental Philosophy Review 37 (4):389-405.
Expression and Speaking-With in the Work of Luce Irigaray.Donald A. Landes - 2008 - In Luce Irigaray & Mary Green (eds.), Luce Irigaray: Teaching. Continuum. pp. 169-180.
A Phenomenology of 'The Other World': On Irigaray's' To Paint the Invisible'.Helen A. Fielding - 2008 - Chiasmi International: Trilingual Studies Concerning Merleau-Ponty's Thought 9:518-534.
Świat według ciała w fenomenologii percepcji M. Merleau-Ponty'ego.Marek Maciejczak - 2001 - Warszawa: Wydawn. Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN. Edited by Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
22 (#662,974)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations