Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):31-39 (1998)
AbstractExamining the naturalist and normativist concepts of health and disease this article starts with analysing the view of C. Boorse. It rejects Boorse's account of health as species-typical functioning, giving a critique of his view based on evolutionary theory of contemporary biology. Then it gives a short overview of the normativist theories of health, which can be objectivist and subjectivist theories. Rejecting the objectivist theories as philosophically untenable, it turns to the subjectivist theories of Gert and Culver, and to the view of Nordenfelt. These theories give quite a good subjectivist account of health and disease, but they do not pay enough attention to the notion of the environment, without which it is impossible to define health and disease. Starting with their definitions but introducing the notion of “reasonable social norms”, the article arrives at the following definition of health: The healthier a physical or mental characteristic, process, reaction is, the more it makes it possible for the individual to adapt to reasonable social norms without pain and suffering, and the longer, and happier a life it will be able to ensure him in that society
Similar books and articles
Concepts of health and disease.Jozsef Kovacs - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):261-267.
A theory of health and disease: The objectivist-subjectivist dichotomy.Robert M. Sade - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (5):513-525.
Coming home to Hume: A sociobiological foundation for a concept of 'health' and morality.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):365 – 375.
The significance of the concept of disease for justice in health care.Thomas Schramme - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
A pathological view of disease.William E. Stempsey - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):321-330.
Fuzzy health, illness, and disease.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):605 – 638.
On the value-neutrality of the concepts of health and disease: Unto the breach again.Scott DeVito - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):539 – 567.
A two-dimensional theory of health.Per-Anders Tengland - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):257-284.
Paracetamol, poison, and polio: Why Boorse's account of function fails to distinguish health and disease.Elselijn Kingma - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):241-264.
Simplified models of the relationship between health and disease.Bjørn Hofmann - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):355-377.
Theoretical Health and Medical Practice.James Krueger - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):491-508.
Emerging medical technologies and emerging conceptions of health.William E. Stempsey - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):227-243.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Second Rebuttal On Health.Christopher Boorse - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (6):683-724.
Rethinking Health: Healthy or Healthier than?S. Andrew Schroeder - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):131-159.
Human Enhancement: Enhancing Health or Harnessing Happiness?Bjørn Hofmann - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (1):87-98.
How to Draw the Line Between Health and Disease? Start with Suffering.Bjørn Hofmann - 2021 - Health Care Analysis 29 (2):127-143.
The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification.Erika Kleiderman, Vardit Ravitsky & Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8):508-513.
References found in this work
On the distinction between disease and illness.Christopher Boorse - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1):49-68.
Concepts of health.Christopher Boorse - 1987 - In Donald VanDeVeer & Tom Regan (eds.), Health Care Ethics: An Introduction. Temple Univ. Press. pp. 377--7.