Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege

Argumentation 24 (3):265-281 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, a challenge is outlined for Walton’s recent analysis of the fallacy of poisoning the well. An example of the fallacy in action during a debate on affirmative action on a South African campus is taken to raise the question of how Walton’s analysis squares with the idea that disadvantaged parties in debates about race may be epistemically privileged . It is asked when the background of a participant is relevant to a debate and it is proposed that a proper analysis of the poisoning the well will outline conditions under which making one participant’s background an issue in a debate would be legitimate and illegitimate. Expanding Walton’s analysis to deal with the challenge, it is concluded that calling into question a participant’s suitability to take part in a debate is never legitimate when it is based simply on a broad fact about their background (like their race or gender)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
On the epistemic value of photographs.Jonathan Cohen & Aaron Meskin - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):197–210.
Wilson on Circular Arguments.J. Ritola - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):295-312.
Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting.Paul K. Moser - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Affirmative Action in Post-Apartheid South Africa.George Carwe - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:77-94.
A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice.Laura Beeby - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):479-486.
From Epistemic Expressivism to Epistemic Inferentialism.Matthew Chrisman - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Did Socrates Die of Hemlock Poisoning?M. William B. Ober - 1982 - Ancient Philosophy 2 (2):115-121.
On the methodology of the race debate: Conceptual analysis and racial discourse.Joshua Glasgow - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):333–358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-11

Downloads
38 (#430,901)

6 months
4 (#855,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Kotzee
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bringing Wreck.Tempest Henning - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.
Citizen Skeptic: Cicero’s Academic Republicanism.Scott Aikin - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (3):275–285.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Radical interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (1):314-328.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (3-4):313-328.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.Elizabeth Anderson - 2014 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.

View all 14 references / Add more references