Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):84-110 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The kind of epistemic relativism usually refuted by its critics is less frequently observable in ethnographic research practices than the critics assume. Instead, methodological conceptual relativism can be recognized in several cases. This has significant practical implications, since the kind of epistemic relativism described by its critics, if rigorously followed, could lead to ethnographers conflating ways of argumentation accepted by their informants, with ways of argumentation accepted in academia, whereas methodological conceptual relativism does not have such consequences
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1177/0048393110387882 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism.Paul Boghossian - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Understanding a Primitive Society.Peter Winch - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):307 - 324.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology.Alison Wylie - 2015 - In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani (eds.), Objectivity in Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 189-210.
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
Robustness, Diversity of Evidence, and Probabilistic Independence.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2015 - In Mäki, Ruphy, Schurz & Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer. pp. 305-316.
Objectivity in Contexts: Withholding Epistemic Judgement as a Strategy for Mitigating Collective Bias.Inkeri Koskinen - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):211-225.
Critical Subjects: Participatory Research Needs to Make Room for Debate.Inkeri Koskinen - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (6):733-751.
View all 7 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Methodological Incommensurability and Epistemic Relativism.Howard Sankey - 2013 - Topoi 32 (1):33-41.
Primitively Rational Belief-Forming Processes.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 180--200.
“Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”.Harold Zellner - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
What is Relativism?Paul Boghossian - 2006 - In Patrick Greenough & Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Truth and Relativism. Clarendon Press. pp. 13--37.
Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement.Alvin I. Goldman - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 187-215.
Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
Circularity and Inconsistency in Kuhn’s Defense of Relativism.Harmon R. Holcomb Iii - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):467-480.
Some Remarks About Relativism and Pseudo-Relativism in Ethics.Shia Moser - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):295 – 304.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-12-05
Total views
29 ( #394,638 of 2,507,636 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,636 )
2010-12-05
Total views
29 ( #394,638 of 2,507,636 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,636 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads