Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (4):325-349 (1986)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
One of the great difficulties with Kant’s moral philosophy is that it seems to imply that our moral obligations leave us powerless in the face of evil. Kant’s theory sets a high ideal of conduct and tells us to live up to that ideal regardless of what other persons are doing. The results may be very bad. But Kant says that the law "remains in full force, because it commands categorically" (G, 438-39/57).* The most weI1—known example of...
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Assertion, Lying, and Untruthfully Implicating.Jessica Pepp - 2019 - In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press.
Lies, Harm, And Practical Interests.Andreas Stokke - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):329-345.
View all 76 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW]Vinit Haksar - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
The Contingency of Evil: Rethinking the Problem of Universal Evil in Kant's 'Religion'.Ryan Kemp - 2011 - In Oliver Thorndike (ed.), Rethinking Kant: Volume 3. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Kant on Human Nature and Radical Evil.Camille Atkinson - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):215-224.
“There is None Righteous”: Kant on the Hang Zum Bösen and the Universal Evil of Humanity.Samuel Duncan - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):137-163.
Kant on the Limits of Human Evil.Paul Formosa - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:189-214.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
1,197 ( #4,789 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,328 of 2,506,511 )
2009-01-28
Total views
1,197 ( #4,789 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,328 of 2,506,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads