Reply to Marquis's "Korcz's objections to the future-of-value argument"

Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):61–65 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00215.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Abortion: Strong's counterexamples fail.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument.Don Marquis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):119-122.
Two moral strategies regarding abortion.Keith Allen Korcz - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (4):581–605.
The Causal-Doxastic Theory of the Basing Relation.Keith Allen Korcz - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):525-550.
Does a Normal Foetus Really Have a Future of Value? A Reply to Marquis.Robert P. Lovering - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (2):131–45.
Korcz's objections to the future-of-value argument.Don Marquis - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):56–60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#589,939)

6 months
2 (#1,244,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two moral strategies regarding abortion.Keith Allen Korcz - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (4):581–605.

Add more references