Ethical Rules for Human Subjects Research: A Case Where the “Is” Must Inform the “Ought”

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):14-15 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(2010). Ethical Rules for Human Subjects Research: A Case Where the “Is” Must Inform the “Ought”. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 14-15

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
The responsible conduct of basic and clinical research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Research ethics.Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) - 2006 - London: Routledge.
Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter?Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.
The Exceptional Ethics of the Investigator-Subject Relationship.B. Sachs - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):64-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Role of Empirical Research in Bioethics.Alexander A. Kon - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):59-65.

Add more references