Beauty or beast, or monstrous regiments? Robertson and Burke on women and the public scene

Modern Intellectual History 1 (3):305-330 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Enlightenment can usefully be conceived as a confrontation with eroding Christian and classical republican ethics. It was permeated with assumptions about women and the gendered dichotomy between public and private spheres. While William Robertson and Edmund Burke, along with many of their contemporaries, remained committed to Christian- and republican-based conceptions of virtue, they were working within a new Enlightenment paradigm. Its political agenda has to be understood by way of its configurations of beauty, taste, and morality as these relate to the imperatives and needs of modern societies of a high level of sophistication and differentiation. An examination of two themes in the work of Robertson and Burkesavagecivilizedbeauty in distressreveals how long-held convictions about the character of women, especially with regard to their capacity and right to appear in the public domain, were modified and adjusted to the idea of progress, and became central to an enlightened affirmation of modern European civilization. The result had its ironies. On the one hand, a positive public and indeed political role was invented for women that is central to understanding the overall thrust of a political discourse based on politeness, civility, refinement and similar values specifically associated with modern commercial societies. On the other hand, though the complexity of this model of society gave ample scope to informal and spontaneous vehicles of social disciplining, whatever room was left for the more traditional ways of governing polities through the direct exertion of political power remained closed to women: the very features that opened for them the opportunity to play political roles through sociability in the public sphere also circumscribed them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Monstrous Women.Dianna Taylor - 2010 - PhaenEx 5 (2):125-151.
Feminism, the public and the private.Joan B. Landes (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Gender and Public Apology.Alice MacLachlan - 2013 - Transitional Justice Review 1 (2):126-47.
Beyond reproduction: Women's health, activism, and public policy.Amanda R. Clarke - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):159-164.
Reconsidering the private–public distinction.Gurpreet Mahajan - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2):133-143.
Grin and Bare It.Jennifer A. Parks - 2004 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):45-53.
Gender(ed) politics in central and eastern europe.Barbara Einhorn - 2006 - Journal of Global Ethics 2 (2):139 – 162.
Hegel, Women, and Hegelian Women on Matters of Public and Private.Dorothy G. Rogers - 1999 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 18 (4):235-255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
22 (#607,190)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?