A Conceptual Analysis of Julian Barbour's Time

Dissertation, University of Leeds (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of Julian Barbour’s main aims is to solve the problem of time that appears in quantum geometrodynamics (QG). QG involves the application of canonical quantization procedure to the Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity. The problem of time arises because the quantization of the Hamiltonian constraint results in an equation that has no explicit time parameter. Thus, it appears that the resulting equation, as apparently timeless, cannot describe evolution of quantum states. Barbour attempts to resolve the problem by allegedly eliminating time from his interpretation of QG. In order to evaluate the efficacy of his solution, it is necessary to ascertain in what sense time has been eliminated from his theory. I proceed to do so by developing a form of conceptual analysis that is applicable to the concept of time in physical theories and applying this analysis to Barbour’s account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice.Crispin Wright - 1989 - Mind 98 (390):289 - 305.
Critical Notice.Colin McGinn - 1987 - Mind 96 (382):263 - 272.
Critical notice.Jeremy Butterfield - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):289-330.
The Definition of Mach’s Principle.Julian Barbour - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1263-1284.
Leibnizian time, Machian dynamics and quantum gravity.Julian B. Barbour - 1986 - In Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. New York ;Oxford University Press. pp. 236-246.
Does time exist in quantum gravity?Claus Kiefer - 2015 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 59:7-24.
Relational Time.Matteo Morganti - 2015 - In Tomasz Bigaj & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Boston: Brill | Rodopi. pp. 215-236.
Have we Lost Spacetime on the Way? Narrowing the Gap between General Relativity and Quantum Gravity.Baptiste Le Bihan & Niels Siegbert Linnemann - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):112-121.
Quantum concepts in space and time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
The Role of Time in Relational Quantum Theories.Sean Gryb & Karim Thébault - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (9):1210-1238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-25

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maria Kon
United States Naval Research Laboratory

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
What Makes Time Special?Craig Callender - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
How to define theoretical terms.David Lewis - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (13):427-446.
Personal identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
Epiphenomenal Qualia.Frank Jackson - 1982 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 96 references / Add more references