What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the Content Validity of Test Items and Theory-Based Scaling

, &
Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Assessing the Validity of Emotional Intelligence Measures.Christopher T. H. Miners, Stéphane Côté & Filip Lievens - 2018 - Emotion Review 10 (1):87-95.
Development and Validation of The CEU-Lopez Critical Thinking Test.Marcos Y. Lopez & Maricris V. Asilo - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (1):32-55.
Development and Validation of The CEU-Lopez Critical Thinking Test.Marcos Y. Lopez & Maricris V. Asilo - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (1):32-55.
The empirical validity of equal discriminability scaling.Earl A. Alluisi & Raymond C. Sidorsky - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (1):86.
Validation of a prioritization tool for patients on the waiting list for total hip and knee replacements.Antonio Escobar, Marta González, José Ma Quintana, Amaia Bilbao & Berta Ibañez - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):97-102.
Anorexia and the MacCAT-T Test for Mental Competence: Validity, Value, and Emotion.Louis C. Charland - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 13 (4):283-287.
Measuring Moral Reasoning using Moral Dilemmas: Evaluating Reliability, Validity, and Differential Item Functioning of the Behavioral Defining Issues Test (bDIT).Youn-Jeng Choi, Hyemin Han, Kelsie J. Dawson, Stephen J. Thoma & Andrea L. Glenn - 2019 - European Journal of Developmental Psychology 16 (5):622-631.
Critique of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test: The More You Know, the Lower Your Score.Kevin Possin - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (4):393-416.
Assessing theory of mind with nonverbal procedures: Problems with training methods and an alternative “key” procedure.Juan Carlos Gómez - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):119-120.
Measuring the Unmeasurable by Ticking Boxes and Opening Pandora's Box? Mixed Methods Research as a Useful Tool for Investigating Exceptional and Spiritual Experiences.Niko Kohls, Anna Hack & Harald Walach - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 30 (1):155-187.
Measuring the Unmeasurable by Ticking Boxes and Opening Pandora's Box? Mixed Methods Research as a Useful Tool for Investigating Exceptional and Spiritual Experiences.Niko Kohls, Anna Hack & Harald Walach - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 30 (1):155-187.
A comparison of moral reasoning stages using a model of hierarchical complexity.Terri Lee Robinett - 2008 - World Futures 64 (5-7):468 – 479.
Applying methods to evaluate construct validity in the context of A level assessment.Victoria Crisp & Stuart Shaw - 2012 - Educational Studies 38 (2):209-222.
Fair division of indivisible items between two players: design parameters for Contested Pile methods. [REVIEW]Rudolf Vetschera & D. Marc Kilgour - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (4):547-572.
Processing of recency items for free recall.Michael J. Watkins & Olga C. Watkins - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-20

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Wisdom, Intuition and Ethics.Trevor Curnow - 1999 - Ashgate Publishing.

Add more references