Mimesis as Make-Believe [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):875-876 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The core of Walton's theory is the claim that make-believe, understood as imagination or pretense, is the common element in all representations--literature, visual arts, theater, film, and opera. He sets out to show that, taking seriously childrens' games as a starting point, we can learn a lot about various kinds of representation. He suspects that make-believe may be crucially involved even in certain religious practices, in sports, in the institutions of morality, and in postulates of "theoretical entities" in science. His theory will help us see, he suggests, that "engaging in make-believe provides practice in roles one might someday assume in real life, that it enables one to come to grips with one's own feelings, that it broadens one's perspectives".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transforming Mimesis.Daniel L. Tate - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):185-208.
Mimesis as Make-Believe. [REVIEW]V. A. Howard - 1993 - International Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):116-117.
A note on mimesis as make-believe. [REVIEW]Richard Wollheim - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (2):401--406.
Review: Mimesis as Make-Beleive. [REVIEW]Noel Carroll - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):93 - 99.
Mimesis in Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory.Bed P. Paudyal - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references